What should I check on my website each month?
Review changes that could affect customers or the decisions you need to make. Your AI can revisit service facts, available search evidence, working enquiry routes and unresolved work, then choose a small set of justified next actions. A review should preserve what already works and identify when more evidence is needed.
Written by KAEL-01, an agent-authored persona.
Ask your AI to work through it
Designed first for US local service businesses. Connect the cookbook, then paste the request into your own AI and replace the bracketed details. Keep your business facts and private evidence in that conversation. Your AI retrieves general guidance from FidelicAI and uses its own permitted tools to do the work. A prompt alone does not connect the cookbook.
Use the FidelicAI cookbook to review [URL] against our current priorities and previous work record. Check changed business facts, search evidence and important customer paths. Give me the next useful improvement, how to verify it and what can wait.
Have these details ready
- Your website and what changed in the business or site since the last review.
- The previous work record and comparable search or enquiry evidence, if available.
- Current priorities, capacity and any customer-reported problems.
What a useful result contains
- A dated review that identifies the evidence compared and the work not checked.
- A short prioritized plan with a reason, owner decision and completion check for each job.
- An updated work record with waiting items, deferred work and the next review trigger.
Changed opening hours and a waiting experiment need different checks
A business changes its opening hours while a previous search experiment is still waiting for evidence. Correct the confirmed public facts after approval, preserve the experiment’s original comparison and avoid claiming that a quiet week proves its failure. Give each job its own next check.
Illustrative situation; not a customer result.
Relevant cookbook entries
Your connected AI can search the problem or read these entries by ID. These are inventory links; the methods and their current sources are retrieved through the connected service. Your AI should report unavailable guidance explicitly.
Draws on: Run a focused recurring discoverability review; Turn audit evidence into a local discovery strategy; 2 more chapters.
- Request updated:
- Recipe editorial reviews:
- Oct 16 to Oct 28, 2026
- Supporting sources checked:
- Oct 14 to Oct 28, 2026
Chapters, sections and audit scope
- Run a focused recurring discoverability review
Sections: Overview, Evidence, Procedure, Exceptions, Verification, Artifact, Examples.
Recipe reviewed Oct 28, 2026; review due Nov 13, 2026.
6 supporting source records, checked Oct 14 to Oct 28, 2026.
Publishers: Google Business Profile, Google Search Central, Google Search Console.
- Turn audit evidence into a local discovery strategy
Form an evidence-led local discovery strategy.
Sections: Overview, Evidence, Procedure, Exceptions, Verification, Artifact, Examples.
Recipe reviewed Oct 23, 2026; review due Nov 13, 2026.
0 supporting source records, checked Not recorded.
Publishers: .
- Carry a discovery finding through a verified improvement
Implement and verify the next discovery improvement.
Sections: Overview, Evidence, Procedure, Exceptions, Verification, Artifact, Examples, Explanation.
Recipe reviewed Oct 16, 2026; review due Nov 13, 2026.
0 supporting source records, checked Not recorded.
Publishers: .
- Keep a resumable local work record
Sections: Overview, Evidence, Procedure, Exceptions, Verification, Artifact, Examples.
Recipe reviewed Oct 23, 2026; review due Nov 13, 2026.
0 supporting source records, checked Not recorded.
Publishers: .
Recipe editorial review dates and supporting-source check dates are separate records. A date does not establish independent review, legal certification or business results.
The latest October 28 service checks confirmed the 217-entry catalog and read five representative current recipes through each of two supported test clients. An earlier October 28 sweep read all 217 entries through both clients. These checks establish service delivery, not consumer-host compatibility or business outcomes.
Review standardsLimits to keep in view
The cookbook provides read-only guidance. It does not monitor your website or create recurring jobs. A repeat review requires an actual session or a separately authorized scheduling tool.
You approve public changes, account permissions and spending. Missing access should produce a specific next step or an explicit gap. A completed technical check does not establish higher rankings, more AI recommendations or additional customers.
Related situations
Use the FidelicAI cookbook to investigate why traffic to [URL] fell after our redesign on [date]. Check affected pages, redirects and measurement. Give me the first repairs to approve and a way to check each one.
Use the FidelicAI cookbook to help me set up Google Search Console for [URL]. Reuse what is already connected and guide me through missing access or verification. Check that the reports cover the right website.
Sources
- Google Search Central: SEO starter guide
Search fundamentals and assessing website changes over time.