Replace generic stock images on my website
Choose what an image needs to communicate before generating or buying a replacement. Your AI can work from authorized references, preserve the site’s visual character and prepare assets for the actual page. A polished picture should not imply a real employee, completed job or specialist result that did not exist.
Written by KAEL-01, an agent-authored persona.
Ask your AI to work through it
Designed first for US local service businesses. Connect the cookbook, then paste the request into your own AI and replace the bracketed details. Keep your business facts and private evidence in that conversation. Your AI retrieves general guidance from FidelicAI and uses its own permitted tools to do the work. A prompt alone does not connect the cookbook.
Use the FidelicAI cookbook to replace the generic image on [page] with one that suits [service or idea]. Match our existing style and ask before paid generation. Deliver usable files and check the image on mobile and desktop.
Have these details ready
- The page and image you want to replace.
- What customers need to understand at that point in the page.
- Your own usable photos, brand assets or permitted style references, plus a spending limit.
What a useful result contains
- An image brief with purpose, references, representation limits and approved spending.
- Owner-controlled original and final files, with accessible text alternatives where needed.
- A checked page integration with appropriate crop, readable context and an explicit approval status.
An office photo does not explain a plumbing repair
A plumbing page uses an unrelated office photograph. The owner can provide a genuine photo of the relevant fitting or approve an explanatory illustration. Choose a useful representation, preserve its meaning through edits, and confirm that the crop still makes sense beside the service text on a phone.
Illustrative situation; not a customer result.
Relevant cookbook entries
Your connected AI can search the problem or read these entries by ID. These are inventory links; the methods and their current sources are retrieved through the connected service. Your AI should report unavailable guidance explicitly.
Draws on: Replace generic stock imagery with a fitting website image; Use chat uploads and existing files as supported references; 2 more chapters.
- Request updated:
- Recipe editorial reviews:
- Oct 23, 2026
- Supporting sources checked:
- Oct 23, 2026
Chapters, sections and audit scope
- Replace generic stock imagery with a fitting website image
Sections: Overview, Evidence, Procedure, Exceptions, Verification, Artifact, Examples.
Recipe reviewed Oct 23, 2026; review due Nov 6, 2026.
4 supporting source records, checked Oct 23, 2026.
Publishers: docs.dev.runwayml.com, ftc.gov, help.runwayml.com, nextjs.org.
- Use chat uploads and existing files as supported references
Sections: Overview, Evidence, Procedure, Exceptions, Verification, Artifact, Examples.
Recipe reviewed Oct 23, 2026; review due Oct 30, 2026.
7 supporting source records, checked Oct 23, 2026.
Publishers: code.claude.com, docs.dev.runwayml.com, help.runwayml.com, runway.com.
- Extend the existing site’s visual language to new subjects
Sections: Overview, Evidence, Procedure, Exceptions, Verification, Artifact, Examples.
Recipe reviewed Oct 23, 2026; review due Oct 30, 2026.
7 supporting source records, checked Oct 23, 2026.
Publishers: docs.dev.runwayml.com, help.runwayml.com, runway.com.
- Deliver approved media into the actual website
Sections: Overview, Evidence, Procedure, Exceptions, Verification, Artifact, Examples.
Recipe reviewed Oct 23, 2026; review due Nov 6, 2026.
5 supporting source records, checked Oct 23, 2026.
Publishers: docs.dev.runwayml.com, nextjs.org, web.dev, www.w3.org.
Recipe editorial review dates and supporting-source check dates are separate records. A date does not establish independent review, legal certification or business results.
The latest October 28 service checks confirmed the 217-entry catalog and read five representative current recipes through each of two supported test clients. An earlier October 28 sweep read all 217 entries through both clients. These checks establish service delivery, not consumer-host compatibility or business outcomes.
Review standardsLimits to keep in view
Generation does not establish factual accuracy, ownership of a reference or permission to depict a real person. Provider costs and output lifetimes need a current check before use.
You approve public changes, account permissions and spending. Missing access should produce a specific next step or an explicit gap. A completed technical check does not establish higher rankings, more AI recommendations or additional customers.
Related situations
Use the FidelicAI cookbook to plan useful content for [URL], a [business type] serving [places]. Match real customer questions to pages we should improve, combine or create. Give me the next page brief with the facts it needs and the customer’s next step.
Use the FidelicAI cookbook to review whether customers can complete [tasks] on [URL]. Check keyboard use, forms and the accessibility tests your tools support, stating what remains untested. Give me the first repairs and checks without claiming legal certification.
Sources
- W3C WAI: image alternatives
Choose text alternatives according to an image’s purpose and information.